Azure assessment · Luxembourg
Azure Platform Evidence Assessment
A fixed-scope review that connects your Azure platform controls to the evidence behind them: policies, privileged access, logging, network exposure, backup, and exceptions, each traced to an owner and a proof. Built for financial and regulated teams in Luxembourg that need to answer DORA and CSSF questions from their real environment.
Who this is for
- → Financial entities and other regulated teams running production workloads on Azure
- → Platform and security teams asked to feed the DORA register of information or a CSSF request with real data
- → IT managers who inherited an Azure environment and need to know whether the controls actually hold up
Typical triggers
- → An audit, a CSSF interaction, or an internal risk review is on the calendar
- → The DORA register of information needs entries you can defend
- → Tags, policies, and diagnostic settings grew organically and nobody trusts them
- → A new cloud officer or risk owner wants an independent baseline
What we review
- → Azure Policy posture: assignments, exemptions, and whether deny rules actually deny
- → Privileged access: role assignments, PIM usage, break-glass accounts, service principals
- → Logging and monitoring: diagnostic settings coverage, Log Analytics routing, retention
- → Network exposure: public endpoints, Private Link coverage, perimeter services
- → Backup and recovery: coverage, geo-replication targets, restore evidence
- → Data location: where storage, processing, logs, and backups live
- → Exception handling: who owns deviations and when they were last reviewed
What you receive
- → Control-to-evidence mapping across Policy, Defender, RBAC, and logging
- → Risk-ranked findings with concrete Azure remediation steps
- → A register-ready view of data locations and platform dependencies
- → Remediation roadmap with owners and a realistic sequence
- → Executive summary plus a technical appendix your engineers can act on
Typically 2 to 3 weeks, fixed scope and fixed fee.
How it works
- 1. Intake call to fix scope and access
- 2. Evidence and architecture review
- 3. Working sessions with your teams
- 4. Findings, roadmap, and executive readout
- 5. Optional follow-up support
We focus on technical architecture, cloud evidence, and remediation roadmaps. Legal interpretation and regulatory sign-off stay with your risk, compliance, or legal teams.
Get the scope and fee on paper.
A short intake call settles scope, access, and dates. The written proposal states the fixed fee before anything starts. We run one or two assessments at a time; dates are agreed together with scope.
Discuss this assessment