Azure assessments · Luxembourg
Azure architecture assessments for regulated teams in Luxembourg
Senior reviews of your Azure platform, API exposure, and AI architecture, for financial and regulated teams that need cloud decisions to be explainable and ready for an audit.
Why architecture evidence matters now
Luxembourg teams operate in a dense regulatory and cross-border environment. DORA has applied to financial entities since January 2025, and the CSSF circulars on ICT third-party services and outsourcing make cloud architecture choices part of the risk conversation.
Identity, API exposure, logging, provider dependency, and AI platforms are no longer purely technical decisions. Each one needs an owner, a reason, and proof you can show an auditor.
Assessment areas
Fixed scope and a fixed fee, quoted upfront, instead of an open-ended staffing engagement.
Azure Platform Evidence Assessment
For teams that run on Azure and need to prove control: policy posture, privileged access, logging, network exposure, backup and recovery, exception handling.
Output: Control-to-evidence mapping across Policy, Defender, RBAC and logging, a risk ranking, and a remediation roadmap with owners.
Typically 2 to 3 weeks.
API Edge / APIM / WAF Architecture Review
For platform teams deciding how APIM, Front Door, Application Gateway, WAF, and Private Link should be arranged for exposure, routing, and control, or preparing an APIM v2 migration.
Output: Reviewed edge topology, a target pattern, WAF exclusion governance, TLS and certificate lifecycle notes, and a sequenced migration plan.
Typically 1 to 2 weeks.
AI & Data Platform Architecture Review
Built for the step from proof of concept to production with Azure OpenAI or AI Foundry, where the access model, data boundaries, and monitoring have to hold up.
Output: Reviewed access and gateway model, a data boundary map, monitoring and cost controls, and an evidence model your risk team can use.
Typically 2 to 3 weeks.
What you receive
- → Findings report with a risk ranking
- → Architecture decision notes
- → Control and evidence mapping
- → Remediation roadmap with owners
- → Executive summary and technical appendix
How it works
- 1. Intake call to fix scope and access
- 2. Evidence and architecture review
- 3. Working sessions with your teams
- 4. Findings, roadmap, and executive readout
- 5. Optional follow-up support
Built on a structured evidence model
Assessments follow a structured evidence model developed on real Azure environments: every control is walked backward to a reason and forward to a proof, with owners and exceptions tracked over time rather than listed once in a slide deck.
We focus on technical architecture, cloud evidence, and remediation roadmaps. Legal interpretation and regulatory sign-off stay with your risk, compliance, or legal teams.
Why GenioCT
- → Senior Azure architecture experience across finance, insurance, and the public sector
- → Deep networking and security background behind the cloud work
- → An audit and evidence mindset
- → Delivery in English, French, and Dutch
- → Remote-first from Brussels, with on-site days in Luxembourg when useful
Bring a decision you need to defend later.
A focused senior review of your Azure platform, API edge, or AI architecture, with written findings, a risk ranking, and a concrete roadmap.
Discuss an assessment