Skip to main content
GenioCT

Azure assessment · Luxembourg

AI & Data Platform Architecture Review

A fixed-scope review of your Azure OpenAI or Microsoft Foundry platform (previously Azure AI Foundry) before it carries production workloads: access model, data boundaries, gateway design, monitoring, and cost control, with the evidence a risk team will ask for once a pilot becomes a product.

Who this is for

  • Teams moving Azure OpenAI or Microsoft Foundry workloads from proof of concept to production
  • Platform teams asked to give scattered AI projects a governed shared foundation
  • Regulated teams whose risk function wants answers on data flows and model access before sign-off

Typical triggers

  • A successful pilot is about to take on real users or real data
  • Several teams each built their own OpenAI resource and the landscape needs consolidating
  • Risk or compliance asked where prompts, embeddings, and outputs actually go
  • Token costs are rising and no line in the bill says which use case caused them

What we review

  • Access model: identities, keys, managed identities, and who can call which model
  • Gateway design: APIM as an AI gateway, quotas, throttling, routing across deployments
  • Data boundaries: where prompts, completions, embeddings, and logs are stored and processed
  • Network posture: private endpoints, egress control, isolation from other workloads
  • Monitoring and cost: token usage, per-consumer attribution, alerting
  • Content controls: filtering configuration and the evidence it produces

What you receive

  • A reviewed access and gateway model with a target design
  • A data boundary map covering prompts, outputs, embeddings, and logs
  • Monitoring and cost controls with per-consumer attribution
  • An evidence model your risk team can reuse
  • Risk-ranked findings and a remediation roadmap

Typically 2 to 3 weeks, fixed scope and fixed fee.

How it works

  • 1. Intake call to fix scope and access
  • 2. Evidence and architecture review
  • 3. Working sessions with your teams
  • 4. Findings, roadmap, and executive readout
  • 5. Optional follow-up support

We focus on technical architecture, cloud evidence, and remediation roadmaps. Legal interpretation and regulatory sign-off stay with your risk, compliance, or legal teams.

Get the scope and fee on paper.

A short intake call settles scope, access, and dates. The written proposal states the fixed fee before anything starts. We run one or two assessments at a time; dates are agreed together with scope.

Discuss this assessment